Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Tax Amortization topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Committee backs drafting a bill to let large projects amortize state sales and use taxes

Minerals, Business & Economic Development · May 9, 2024
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Lawmakers asked staff to prepare an updated draft of a 2021 proposal (SF 61) allowing amortization of certain sales-and-use taxes for large projects, limiting amortization to state shares and requiring lien/surety protections; committee discussed whether local governments should be able to opt in.

The Minerals, Business & Economic Development Committee asked staff to prepare a revised draft of a sales‑and‑use tax amortization bill previously considered in 2021, a proposal intended to help very large projects spread upfront sales and use tax obligations over time.

Staff member Brian Grenbick reviewed the prior concept: qualifying projects would have expenditures exceeding $5 million in the first two years and could apply to the Department of Revenue for a negotiated amortization schedule covering the portion of sales tax distributed to state accounts (not local shares). A lien or first‑priority security interest would protect the state's interest during the amortization term.

Cochair Burkhart and other senators said the proposal is not a tax cut but a cash‑flow tool for billion‑dollar projects, noting examples where projects must find hundreds of millions for initial taxes. Senator Rothfuss urged a working group and stakeholder outreach to resolve concerns raised during the bill's previous consideration, including local governments' interest in opting into amortization for their share of revenue.

The committee approved a staff request to draft language that includes staff comments and agency suggestions and signaled willingness to convene a working group to resolve outstanding issues, including how local opt‑in mechanics and lien/surety provisions would work.

What to watch: staff will prepare a draft derived from SF 61 for the July meeting; committee members asked for early stakeholder engagement so drafting can be completed with time for public posting.