Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Procurement Flags topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Sen. Glenn Meyer urges Nebraska to buy only U.S.-made flags for government use
Summary
Sen. Glenn Meyer introduced LB1081 to require state agencies and political subdivisions to purchase U.S.-manufactured U.S. and Nebraska flags, with an exception for small flags under 8x6 inches; supporters said the change would boost local jobs and durability, while committee members pressed on fiscal assumptions.
Get email alerts on the Procurement Flags topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Sen. Glenn Meyer introduced LB1081, which would require Nebraska state agencies and political subdivisions to purchase flags manufactured in the United States, except for small flags under 8 inches by 6 inches. Meyer said the measure is "common sense," arguing American-made flags use higher-grade materials and double-stitched construction that improve durability and long-term value.
The bill would apply to flags representing the United States and the state of Nebraska. Meyer cited past federal and state efforts to prefer American-made flags and said the requirement would support domestic jobs and local businesses. He asked the committee to advance LB1081 to the floor.
Vice Chair Sen. Bob Anderson and other senators questioned the fiscal note and whether the bill requires immediate replacement of existing flags or only replacement as flags wear out. Anderson cited the fiscal office's figures, stating the total cost would be about $13,009.50, and that limiting the calculation to replacement by attrition reduced the estimate to about $6,000. Meyer and other supporters said they expect any incremental cost to be offset by greater longevity of American-made flags and suggested using Educational Service Units (ESUs) as a procurement resource for smaller flags.
No proponents testified in person at the hearing; the online record showed nine proponents and no opponents. Sen. Meyer closed the presentation by reiterating the bill's economic and durability arguments and welcomed committee questions and amendments.
The committee did not take a formal vote during the hearing; the sponsor indicated willingness to answer follow-up questions about fiscal estimates and procurement options.
