Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Student Performance topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Resident voices anger over low state test scores; superintendent acknowledges district ranked near bottom and pledges follow‑up

Summers County Board of Education · September 11, 2024
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

During public comment a resident criticized low state assessment results and staffing shortages; in his report the superintendent confirmed the district ranks among the lowest in the state and said staff will present an improvement plan and financial staffing clarifications at the next board meeting.

A resident during public comment told the board the recent state testing results were "not good" and urged immediate action, telling the superintendent, "If we don't get qualified people in here, mister superintendent, it's not gonna get any better." The speaker recounted families moving their children to neighboring districts and said test scores left students unprepared for postsecondary opportunities.

Why it matters: public concern about student performance was a central theme of the meeting and shaped several follow‑up items the board discussed, including how to use COVID carryover funds and academic support programs to raise achievement.

In the superintendent's report later in the meeting, he acknowledged low statewide test performance and told the board the district is "one of the lower performing" systems, ranking tied for 55th out of 55 counties in the state assessment rankings. He framed the results as a "point in time" data set and noted positive counterpoints—most notably a historically high graduation rate this year—but said the district must show improvement and will present a plan and more detailed data at the next meeting.

The superintendent also reviewed a staffing/certified‑list discrepancy, reporting the district is 0.65 over on professional positions and 7.45 over on service staff (largely related to special education needs) and that corrections will be made on the certified list to align funding and staffing roles. He suggested staff will present the aligned certified list and financials in October.

Next step: the superintendent will return with detailed test‑score data, an improvement plan and reconciled staffing/financial figures at the next board meeting; the board discussed town halls and informational outreach in support of a future levy.