Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Artificial Turf topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Greenville County School Board approves $24.06 million to convert high‑school game fields to artificial turf after debate
Summary
After hours of public comment and board discussion about health, maintenance and equity, the Greenville County School Board voted to use a one‑time $24,060,010 fund balance transfer to convert multiple high‑school fields to artificial turf; opponents urged delays and site visits.
The Greenville County School Board voted to approve a recommended transfer of $24,060,010 of unassigned fund balance to pay for converting several high‑school game fields to artificial turf, concluding a lengthy public comment period and debate about safety, costs and maintenance.
Supporters, including parents and athletic directors, told the board artificial turf would keep fields playable through wet weather and expand opportunities for students. David Horner, introduced by staff as a parent of two athletes, said the investment would "keep these fields open during tough times" and called it "a commitment to keeping these fields open during tough times."
Opponents, including members of the public and some trustees, urged caution. Laura Allen warned about materials in some artificial turf systems and cited studies linking turf to higher injury rates: "One of the key elements is polyurethane, which can cause respiratory disease, skin irritation, and asthma," she said, and cited a 2019 study that found high‑school athletes were more likely to sustain injuries on turf. A public commenter who asked for site visits said she wanted to speak with athletic directors and students before voting.
District administrators and staff described the research as mixed and stressed experience maintaining fields. Dr. Royster (identified during the meeting), summarizing staff work, said "there is no clear cut injury difference" across all studies and outlined prior installations and maintenance plans. Colonel Carlin and maintenance staff described earlier installations (initial installation in 2012 with recent replacements) and the district's proposed maintenance and warranty requirements, including G‑max testing to ensure surface consistency.
Administrators told the board the funding would come from one‑time fund balance that originated from earlier COVID‑era budget savings and is not recurring. They also presented an implementation timeline that would phase installations across multiple years so the district could overhaul fields at 15 high schools over time.
A motion to table the item and take additional site visits was introduced during the meeting, but after debate the board proceeded with the recommended transfer and the chair announced the motion to move forward "passes." The board then moved on to the next agenda item.
Votes at a glance: the board also approved a separate motion to purchase property for White Hampton High School for $975,000 following a brief motion and second.
What happens next: Administrators said they will proceed with the phased timetable and include contractor warranty and maintenance provisions; board members who expressed concern said they will monitor safety data and maintenance outcomes as installations proceed.
