Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Historic Preservation topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board backs window replacements at 1337 DeKalb Street; one member votes no

Norristown Historic Architectural Review Board · February 26, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Norristown Historic Architectural Review Board recommended a certificate of appropriateness for window replacements at 1337 DeKalb Street (Provia ARRIS wood‑clad windows and SDL grids), with leaded glass windows preserved; the recommendation passed with one 'no' vote and will proceed to municipal council.

The Norristown Historic Architectural Review Board voted to recommend that municipal council issue a certificate of appropriateness for window replacement work at 1337 DeKalb Street, after hearing details from the project representative and reviewing proposed window types and grid patterns.

A project representative described the scope: Provia ARRIS wood‑clad windows will be used, with simulated divided light (SDL) grids attached to the outside on the first and second floors and interior or between‑glass grids on the third floor so the street appearance remains consistent. The board confirmed that existing leaded and stained glass windows will remain and that exterior frames will be repaired, scraped and repainted as part of the work. The project team noted the house has a mix of interior window finishes; the exterior profiles will be matched.

During discussion a board member asked about porch rot unrelated to this application; the applicants said porch rebuilding is not included in the current scope and may return for separate review. A member cited approximate per‑unit pricing for high‑end replacement windows ("about $2,000" per window) as background for the applicant's cost considerations.

The board moved and seconded a recommendation to municipal council; the roll call shows the motion carried with a majority and one recorded no vote. The recommendation will be forwarded to municipal council for final action.