Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Youth Council topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Harrisburg council debates future of youth council, adviser and membership limits
Summary
Council members discussed whether Harrisburg should maintain its own youth council or rely on county programs, how to define its mission and jurisdiction, adviser stipend (suggested ~$100/month), membership caps and reporting requirements; staff will return with formal recommendations.
The Town of Harrisburg council spent significant workshop time discussing the status and structure of the town’s youth council, which staff said has operated in an ad hoc way and now needs clearer mission, jurisdiction and administration.
Rob told council the youth council had been "popular" but not well defined. "If we are to continue youth council... we need some direction on what's council's desire for the youth council as far as jurisdictions," he said.
Council members debated whether the town should establish a Harrisburg-only youth council or encourage youth participation in the county youth commission, which currently draws representatives from high schools across the county. Age ranges and eligibility were discussed; council members repeatedly suggested focusing on high school students (roughly grades 9–11 or ages 13–18).
The group discussed adviser logistics and possible compensation. Staff said earlier conversations envisioned a modest stipend in the range of about $100 per month for an adviser and a program budget for activities and trips around $3,000–$5,000 annually. April, the current volunteer who has supported the program, was referenced repeatedly as the de facto advisor; staff and council said a formal selection process and role description would be needed.
Council members flagged accountability gaps: meeting minutes are not consistently produced, bylaws are not always followed, and there is no single staff liaison. Staff reported there are currently 36 active youth council members on the roster, which several council members said may be too large for a functional program.
Several council members said they wanted staff to compare the county model and return with options: (1) formally adopt a Harrisburg youth council with a defined mission, adviser and application limits; (2) rely on the county program and enable Harrisburg youth to participate; or (3) vest the program in an existing department with budgeted adviser support. Rob said staff will report back with a recommendation and specifics for councillor consideration.
Council members also discussed meeting cadence and oversight: the youth council meets on the fourth Tuesday at 6 p.m., and council members suggested quarterly reporting or a quarterly presentation to council as part of accountability measures.
The council gave staff direction to research options and return with a proposed structure, application process and potential adviser candidates.
