Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Education Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Lakeland board hears update on state bills; members voice concern about private‑school tryout proposals
Summary
The board's legislative liaison outlined several bills under consideration — including proposals on contracted transportation, teacher licensure waivers, classroom device rules and private‑school student tryouts — and Horrell warned the tryout language could enable athletic‑focused private schools to raid public programs.
The board's legislative liaison reviewed multiple pending state bills that could affect Lakeland operations and programming, and board members and administrators discussed potential fiscal and competitive impacts.
The liaison described a bill introduced as "SB 18 96," saying that, "as introduced right now, we requireboards of education that contract for transportation services ... that they would have to provide transportation to any student that lives more than 1.5 miles," a change that would impose new operational rules on districts that contract out bus service. The liaison also summarized proposals to waive licensure for experienced private‑school teachers (HB 18 88 / SB 21 09), to regulate device use in classrooms (SB 23 10 / HB 23 93), to allow small private‑school students to try out for public teams (SB 18 22 / HB 17 85) and proposals expanding open enrollment and altering student‑teacher ratios (HB 3 28 / SB 3 49).
Horrell raised a specific concern about the private‑school tryout proposals: "allowing private schools to allow students to try out and potentially be on a team at a public school ... could potentially set up a situation where somebody set up a, I'll say, in quote, school, for athletes, and basically just send them en masse to, to try out for our teams," he said, warning of potential impacts on local athletics and the funding that underpins them.
Charles Solis thanked staff for the legislative summary and urged community members to contact state legislators and local education mediators to express concerns about bills that could create unfunded obligations for districts.
No formal board action was taken on the bills at this meeting; board members were told they will have opportunities to weigh in as legislation advances.
