Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Litigation topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Clallam County commissioners authorize prosecutor to reject plaintiff's settlement offer

Clallam County Board of Commissioners · January 5, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

After a closed executive session to discuss potential litigation, the Clallam County Board of Commissioners voted to authorize the prosecuting attorney's office to direct outside counsel Duncan Fobes to tell plaintiff Anders Tron Huckabow that his settlement offer is rejected.

The Clallam County Board of Commissioners held a special meeting and — after a brief executive session to discuss potential litigation — authorized the prosecuting attorney's office to instruct outside counsel Duncan Fobes to notify plaintiff Anders Tron Huckabow that his settlement offer is rejected.

Commissioner Mark Ozias moved to "authorize the prosecutor's office to communicate with our outside attorney, Duncan Fobes, to communicate with the plaintiff ... that his settlement offer is rejected." Commissioner Mike French seconded the motion. A voice vote followed; commissioners present responded "aye" and the motion passed.

The board opened the meeting and announced a special executive session citing the transcript reference to "rcw 42.30.1ten" to discuss potential litigation. For the record the meeting named attendees including Commissioner Mike French and Commissioner Mark Ozias; the transcript also listed Tom Milton (county administrator) and Tammy Solinger (human resources) as attendees but they did not speak on the record in the portions of the transcript provided.

The authorization gives the prosecuting attorney's office permission to have outside counsel communicate the board's decision on the settlement offer. The transcript does not record additional public details about the subject matter of the litigation, the amount or terms of the settlement offer, or any further timeline for related proceedings.

After the vote the chair closed the meeting and the session was adjourned. No additional actions or next steps were recorded in the transcript provided.