Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Zoning Unified Development Ordinance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council adopts wide-ranging Unified Development Ordinance text amendments
Summary
City planning staff presented planning-commission-recommended changes to the Unified Development Ordinance — expanding allowed recycle-center materials, clarifying infill setbacks, adding OS-district process charts, standards for private cemeteries, deferred-parking provisions, gazebo/pergola rules and condo/subdivision review clarifications — and council approved the amendments unanimously.
Planning staff summarized a package of text amendments to the City of Holland's Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) and the council voted to adopt the changes on Sept. 4.
Senior planner Steve Peterson told the council the planning commission recommended updates to make the UDO more user-friendly and to close gaps staff encountered while implementing the code. The amendments expand permitted materials for industrial recycling centers; change infill provisions so building setbacks apply across yard types instead of only the front yard; and add a process chart for the open-space (OS) zoning district so private development proposals (for example, small additions at private cemeteries) have a clearly defined review path.
Peterson said the package also adds a p‑star standard for private cemeteries that requires compliance with state law, a 10-foot setback for burials, and residential buffering where cemeteries border homes. The UDO will include deferred-parking rules that allow applicants to delay construction of required parking under specified standards and permit officials to require the parking later if necessary.
On accessory structures, staff proposed explicit standards for gazebos, pergolas and picnic shelters and clarified that such structures may require a permit but will not count toward the cap on detached accessory buildings when they are intended for outdoor recreation rather than storage. Peterson said the rule will reduce confusion and cited a handout prepared by a staff member to illustrate the distinction.
Council members asked questions about how the changes would affect permits and neighborhood impacts. One councilor said requiring permits could add a barrier for homeowners; staff replied permits already apply for substantial structures and the new rules are intended to make the code clearer and provide flexibility.
Council moved to approve item 10a as presented. The roll call recorded affirmative votes from the members present and the motion carried.
The amendments were described in the planning commission report and brought forward by staff; planning staff said they received no public comments during the planning commission review.
