Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Public Comments Transparency topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Residents press Palm Coast council on drainage, permit records and developer influence

Palm Coast City Council · February 25, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

During public comment at the Feb. 24 workshop residents urged the council to improve transparency on drainage repairs and permit records and questioned late information and developer donations tied to recent approvals.

Residents used the workshop—s public-comment period to press the council on infrastructure failures, transparency and potential developer influence on votes.

Jeremy Davis, a Palm Coast resident, said he has raised neighborhood drainage and permit-record concerns with the city since August 2023 and told the council he found what he said were deleted permit comments in an audit log. "If transparency is the priority, why were permit notes removed from public view without clear explanation?" he asked, and said his home flooded after a city-approved elevation change next door. Davis also cited the city—s recent utility bond authorizations while questioning whether promised resilience investments have reduced neighborhood failures.

Another resident criticized a recent development approval, saying last-minute information and developer offers affected the council—s decision-making. Mark Webb, who also spoke during public comment, asked why an item was not tabled so the public could review newly introduced material.

Why it matters: Several public commenters said low overall turnout at technical workshops should not be treated as consent to major governance changes; they urged councilors to explain proposals clearly and not rely on procedural or technical assumptions to move issues quietly.

Council response and follow-up: Council members acknowledged the concerns. The mayor and staff confirmed a meeting was already scheduled between city staff and Mr. Davis to review his records; Councilors reiterated they would seek clearer public documentation of long-term liabilities and asked staff to develop consolidated, accessible documents showing obligations and funding. No formal findings were made during the workshop.

Quote

"Make it make sense," Davis said, asking the city to provide clearer consolidated documentation of long-term obligations and liabilities so residents can engage without resorting to litigation.

Next steps

Council asked staff to follow up on the permit-record questions, verify the audit logs Davis cited and return guidance on how to present long-term obligations and funding sources in a consolidated public format.