Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Tobacco Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Clatsop County adopts ordinance tightening tobacco retail licensing; maintains 1,000‑foot school buffer
Summary
The board adopted ordinance 26‑06 to amend county code 5.2 on tobacco retail licensing, keeping a 1,000‑foot buffer from public schools and transitioning oversight to align with Oregon Health Authority guidance while preserving local inspections and fee collection.
Get email alerts on the Tobacco Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Clatsop County commissioners adopted ordinance 26‑06 amending county code section 5.2 on tobacco retail licensing after a second reading. The ordinance preserves a 1,000‑foot buffer prohibiting retail licenses within that distance of a public school (defined in the ordinance as kindergarten through high school) and aligns local licensing with Oregon Health Authority guidance while retaining county inspection authority and fee collection.
Chuck Wheeler, speaking for the Health and Human Services staff, said the Planning Commission and staff worked to preserve the 1,000‑foot restriction and clarified that "school" in the ordinance is defined as any public kindergarten, elementary, middle, junior high or high school. Wheeler said the county will coordinate with the Oregon Health Authority and Department of Revenue on the transition while continuing its own inspection processes and associated fees.
Commissioners discussed whether the definition of "school" should be broadened later to include private schools or childcare facilities; County counsel and staff said that would likely require a separate amendment and public hearing. Commissioner Banks urged that the board explore expanding the definition in a future ordinance amendment and stressed moving forward with the state transition now to ensure consistent enforcement.
A motion to adopt ordinance 26‑06 was moved and seconded; commissioners present signaled their approval and the motion carried. The board recorded no additional public testimony on the item and will return to potential definition changes as a separate ordinance amendment if the board directs staff to pursue that path.

