Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Personnel topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board approves consent agenda after debate over Ojibwe-language hire
Summary
Board members debated an Ojibwe-language hire listed as item D on the consent agenda, with some questioning candidate scoring and dialect fit; administration and the language committee defended the recommendation and the consent agenda was approved with objections recorded.
The Red Lake Public School District board approved its consent agenda on Jan. 22 after a contentious exchange over a hiring recommendation for an Ojibwe-language position.
One board member said the other finalist had a higher score and argued the district should hire someone rooted in the Red Lake dialect. "The other person that applied got a higher score than this guy," the member said, adding concerns about dialect differences affecting instruction. Another board member and district staff pushed back, urging trust in the committee process and the administration's vetting.
Dr. G (a member of the language and hiring committee) told the board the committee was unanimous in recommending the candidate it believed could best deliver the program's goals: producing conversational speakers by 12th grade. The committee cited pedagogical skill, interview performance and some bonus scoring for tribal enrollment as factors in its decision.
"We felt this was the person that was gonna help us to get the goal where we wanna go," the committee representative said. Board members discussed whether to pull the single hire from consent for separate discussion; several urged greater use of advance working sessions or MSBA training so members could review materials earlier.
The board ultimately moved to approve the consent agenda as presented; one or more board members recorded objections and at least one abstention was noted during later votes related to financial authorizations. The Olsen family's $6,000 donation for a peer leadership program was included on consent and a thank-you letter was circulated for signatures.
The board chair said that if a board member has concerns about a specific consent item they should ask questions before the meeting and that working sessions or earlier packet review could reduce surprise objections.
