Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Education Finance topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

House committee debates details of 'Dream Scholarship' while holding bill for more work

House Higher Education Committee, Georgia House of Representatives · March 2, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The House Higher Education Committee heard a detailed presentation on HB1413, the 'Dream Scholarship' implementation bill, focusing on eligibility, a flexible work requirement, the $3,000 annual award cap, and how a $325 million appropriation would be managed. Lawmakers asked for clearer rules and asked GSFA to develop operational guidance before the bill returns for action.

Chairman Martin presented the substitute for HB1413, calling it the statutory framework to implement the governor’s ‘Dream Scholarship’ through the Georgia Student Finance Authority. The bill would allow awards up to $3,000 per year to fill students’ unmet financial need, limited to undergraduate degrees at public institutions in the initial rollout, and would be administered with reporting and rules set by the Student Finance Commission.

Why it matters: The committee and witnesses framed the scholarship as a major, state-level investment (the amended budget includes roughly $325 million) intended to reduce student financial barriers and accelerate graduation. Committee members sought clarity on which students and institutions would be eligible, how the work requirement would operate, and whether private colleges should be included so aid can “follow the student.”

Key provisions and debate: Chairman Martin said the substitute removed loans from the definition of qualifying financial aid and narrowed the initial eligibility to Technical College System of Georgia (TCSG) and University System of Georgia (USG) students, with potential future expansion to nonpublic institutions. He summarized that the scholarship is “up to $3,000 per year” to fill an “unmet need” and that the Student Finance Authority would administer awards. Chris Green of the Georgia Student Finance Authority told the committee the bill’s language contemplates both direct and indirect costs ("tuition, housing, food, transportation") and described a plan to seed an endowment and make initial awards this fall.

On the work requirement, members pressed whether mandating employment would hurt academic progress. Chairman Martin said the bill uses a flexible approach: recipients must "be engaged in paid or unpaid work at least part time," and university and technical-college financial-aid offices would have discretion to determine acceptable activities (employment, internship, volunteer work, military service), with details set in rules and regulations. Representative Clark asked whether study-hall or tutoring could satisfy the requirement; the chair said the language is intentionally flexible so financial-aid officers can tailor requirements to individual students.

Private colleges: Jenna Colvin of the Georgia Independent College Association urged that private nonprofit colleges be included so the scholarship can follow the student. Committee members noted the substitute reverted to the governor’s original plan to start with TCSG and USG because private institutions do not report to the same state boards; the chair said the committee could revisit inclusion once operational details are worked out.

Funding and timing: The chair said the budget placed $300+ million in a non‑lapsing fund intended to seed an endowment for the program; the committee was told the first tranche would be used for initial awards and that statutory authority would be preferable to rely on rules rather than executive action. Chris Green said the authority has not yet provided an estimate of how many students would be served and that a campus-allocation model is one administration option.

What’s next: Committee members asked staff and Mr. Green to refine rules and implementation logistics; the bill was held over for further work and is expected back for action soon.

Ending: The committee heard extensive testimony and requested operational clarifications before considering a final vote on HB1413.