Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Land Use Rezoning topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Zoning board narrowly backs neighborhood-commercial rezoning near Quintet/Tunnel Road after heated public opposition

Santa Rosa County Zoning Board · January 8, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Santa Rosa County zoning board recommended approval 4–3 of a rezoning request to allow neighborhood commercial uses at 3280 Toner Road, prompting residents to warn the board the TunneI/Quintet intersection is unsafe and that a conceptual plan was not provided.

The Santa Rosa County Zoning Board recommended approval on Jan. 8 of a rezoning request that would change about 2.61 acres at 3280 Toner Road from rural residential to neighborhood commercial, a decision that drew dozens of residents who urged the board to deny the request because of traffic and drainage concerns.

Applicant Mike Price said he seeks neighborhood commercial zoning to allow low-intensity uses such as small medical offices or eateries under 1,000 square feet and that the parcel is close to an existing commercial corridor. "This area is going commercial — I think neighborhood commercial is the highest and best use," Price said, adding that site development would include engineered drainage if the property were developed.

Neighbors called that reasoning insufficient. "That intersection is deadly," said Corey Wolf, a Tunnel Road resident, who described regular crashes and limited sight lines at the Quintet/Tunnel intersection. Several residents cited a fatal crash previously reported near the same junction and urged the board to withhold rezoning until traffic improvements are planned. "We need a plan; we need to fix the intersection first," one resident said.

Other neighbors raised stormwater concerns after trees on the parcel were cleared, saying runoff already affects adjacent yards and that an engineered drainage plan would be required if the site were commercial. "Clearing this land is just going to make it runoff like an asphalt jungle," said John Kellum, who lives near the site.

Board members split on the issue. Supporters said neighborhood commercial is a lower-intensity zoning category than the highway-commercial request the applicant made previously, and that the district permits small, neighborhood-serving businesses that often sit adjacent to residential uses. Opponents emphasized the lack of a conceptual site plan and the need for traffic improvements before approving a change that could bring even modest additional trips to the intersection.

After debate, a motion to recommend approval passed 4–3. Board members recorded no formal mitigation condition tied to county-funded road work; staff said site-plan review would require traffic analysis and any developer would be subject to engineering requirements and any applicable state access-management rules.

The board’s recommendation is advisory; the rezoning will go to the Santa Rosa County Board of County Commissioners at a Jan. 22 meeting. If approved by commissioners, any future development would still have to comply with county site-plan and stormwater standards.