Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Governance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board adopts evaluation instrument and timeline, votes for full‑board participation
Summary
The board voted to continue using its current superintendent evaluation instrument, approved dates for submittal and executive sessions in October, and adopted a motion for the whole board to participate in the superintendent evaluation process.
After reconvening from executive session, the board moved to a set of action items concerning the superintendent’s evaluation.
Doctor Archambault moved that the board use the current evaluation instrument for the superintendent’s formative evaluation cycle (consistent with board policy CBI and regulation CBIR). The motion was seconded by Mister Jaramillo and carried on roll call.
Doctor Archambault then moved — with a friendly amendment accepted during discussion — that the full board participate in superintendent evaluations going forward. Miss Hunt Daley recorded an objection on the record, saying the board should continue the process it had already started, but the motion passed on a roll call with at least one dissenting vote.
The board also approved a timeline for completing the evaluation: submittal of completed evaluation forms by Oct. 7, an executive session Oct. 8 to review inputs, compilation review on Oct. 15 and a special executive session on Oct. 29 to present feedback to the superintendent. The board clerk conducted roll‑call votes for each motion and the motions carried as recorded. No changes to policy text were adopted at the meeting; these were procedural decisions about instrument use, participation and schedule.
The board placed the timeline and executive‑session dates on the calendar and staff were instructed to circulate the evaluation form and logistics to board members.
