Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Personnel Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioners postpone vote on separation and rehire policy amid pay-equity concerns
Summary
After lengthy discussion about whether rehired employees should receive partial or full credit for prior service, and how that would affect pay equity (especially in dispatch), the commission tabled the policy and scheduled a special meeting to consider individualized options and revisions.
Commissioners delayed final approval of an administrative Separation and Rehire Policy after weeks of staff work and an extended public discussion about how to credit prior service for employees affected by layoffs.
Staff presented the policy’s key change: rehired employees would receive credit equal to 50% of their years of prior service when calculating pay-step placement, and a three-tiered priority for filling positions after layoffs that gives laid-off employees first right of refusal. Staff said the change is intended to recognize institutional knowledge while protecting pay equity across departments.
Commissioners, staff and affected employees debated the treatment of people who would move from corrections into dispatch: staff noted a legal distinction between a "transfer" (a move dictated by management) and a new internal hire following a layoff, arguing that the county typically treats the latter as a rehire and not a transfer. Commissioners worried that granting full credit could place rehired employees above long-serving dispatchers and distort morale and pay equity.
An employee who said he has 12 years of county service told the commission the current proposal would afford him "roughly a $10 an hour pay cut" compared with transferring his full years of service; commissioners discussed options such as larger credits, conditional step increases after certification, additional vacation or other compensating measures.
Rather than vote, the commission asked staff to draft individualized options and agreed to hold a special meeting within roughly a month to resolve the issue before layoffs and rehirings take effect. A commissioner asked staff to bring alternative policy language and potential compensation pathways for specific cases so the commission can act quickly at the special meeting.
The commission did not adopt the policy at this meeting; it was tabled pending the special meeting and additional staff proposals.
