Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Tuition Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Administration recommends keeping tuition-language but not pursuing active tuition for Riverview SD
Summary
After surveying 42 districts (23 responses), administration recommended retaining contingency tuition language but not actively accepting tuition students, citing legal, equity, staffing and PIAA athletic classification concerns and that Riverview's PDE-calculated tuition rates exceed county averages.
Riverview SD administrators presented a follow-up review of a possible tuition policy and recommended against actively accepting tuition students while leaving contingency language in district policy.
Chair (S1) summarized a survey of neighboring districts and superintendent outreach: administrators received feedback from 23 of 42 districts contacted. He said most districts keep tuition-language in policy as a contingency but do not accept tuition students in practice. Citing multiple concerns — special-education funding and services, equity, liability, staffing and athletic classification rules — the administration's recommendation was that “the risks ... outweigh the benefits.”
The administration shared PDE-calculated tuition-rate comparisons. The transcript records the state average elementary tuition rate as $12,720.66 and Riverview's elementary tuition-rate calculation as $15,412.00; the secondary average cited was about $14,000 and Riverview's comparable figure discussed was about $18,000. The administration noted that those rates would be prohibitive for many families and that other districts that experimented with staff-only reduced rates later removed the language because it proved costly.
Board members discussed logistics and equity implications, including potential special-education cost increases if tuition students later required costly services and whether accepting students would trigger athletic reclassification under PIAA rules. One board member urged caution about redistricting or politically charged approaches to recruiting students from neighboring areas.
The transcript does not show a formal vote; the chair said the administrative recommendation was to leave the policy language in place for contingency use or remove it entirely later if the board prefers, rather than to implement an active tuition program at this time.
