Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Special Education topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Special School District webinar offers tools for parents to handle crucial IEP conversations
Summary
Jeremy Lowe, SSD's director of equity teaching and learning, outlined practical communication frameworks — STATE and AMPP — and three safety tools (apology, contrasting, CRIB) for parents and IEP teams to move from conflict to action in IEP meetings. Recording and resources will be posted by SSD FACE.
Jeremy Lowe, director of equity teaching and learning at the Special School District, told parents during a FACE webinar that handling high‑stakes IEP conversations requires both clear goals and specific communication skills.
Lowe opened the session by framing a “crucial conversation” as one where the stakes are high, opinions differ and emotions run strong, and he urged attendees to bring practical routines — not just arguments — to IEP meetings. “Start with your heart,” he said, advising parents to be clear about what they want for themselves, their child and the relationship before raising concerns.
The presentation focused on restoring psychological safety so more factual information enters what Lowe called the “pool of shared meaning.” He explained the physiological basis for conflict — adrenaline shifts reasoning away from the frontal lobes — and recommended pausing when participants notice fight, flight or freeze responses. Lowe recommended three tools to lower temperature and rebuild trust: apologize where appropriate; use contrasting language ("I don’t want you to think... I do want...") to correct misunderstandings; and use CRIB (commit to finding mutual purpose) to identify shared goals and brainstorm solutions.
Lowe introduced two communication frameworks parents can use at the table. STATE (Share facts; Tell your story; Ask for others’ paths; Talk tentatively; Encourage testing) guides how to present observations and invite correction. AMP/AMPP (Ask, Mirror, Paraphrase, Prime) provides a sequence to surface others’ perspectives and keep dialogue productive. He recommended factual opening lines (for example, “I’ve noticed X happened three times”) followed by tentative language (“I’m wondering if...”) to avoid absolutes that escalate conflict.
The presenter listed common IEP flashpoints — disputed evaluations, placement, service levels, regression and behavior management — and said these are appropriate times to use the protocols. He also reviewed four decision methods teams may use (command, consultation, voting, consensus) and emphasized documenting who will take what action and when, to avoid productive conversations that lead to no follow‑up.
The webinar host, identified in the session as Ladonna from FACE (Family and Community Engagement), opened and closed the event and provided logistical details: closed captioning was active, the session was recorded, and SSD will post the recording to its YouTube channel within one week. Participants were invited to submit questions through the webinar Q&A or by emailing FACE at FACESSDMO.org.
The session ended with a summary of key takeaways — acknowledge high stakes and emotions, protect mutual purpose and respect, separate facts from the stories that drive emotion, use STATE and AMP/AMPP to surface perspectives, and convert dialogue into clear action steps with assigned follow‑up.
