Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get AI Briefings, Transcripts & Alerts on Local & National Government Meetings — Forever.

Kettering schools outline $222 million May 5 bond to fund 'Future Ready Facilities'

Kettering Board of Education · March 4, 2026

Loading...

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

District staff told the board the Board of Education has filed required documents for a May 5 ballot question to raise $222,000,000 for segment 1 of the district's Future Ready Facilities plan and said the Ohio Facilities Construction Commission (OFCC) is projected to contribute roughly $159,000,000; without OFCC support a full-renovation option was estimated at about $350,000,000.

The Kettering Board of Education heard a presentation on March 3 that the district has filed paperwork to place a $222 million bond question on the May 5 ballot to fund segment 1 of its “Future Ready Facilities” plan, a district staff member said.

The presenter said bond levy proceeds can only be used for major construction, renovation or land acquisition, not day-to-day operations, and contrasted bond levies with operating and permanent improvement levies. The district’s slide deck projected an OFCC contribution of about $159 million toward the project; the presenter said that without state OFCC funds, renovating existing facilities would cost about $350 million.

The presenter also shared a homeowner cost estimate for clarity: for a property listed at $100,000 in the Montgomery County auditor records, the monthly cost to support the bond was shown as roughly $17.30 per month after ballot language certification, according to the presentation.

Why it matters: The discussion frames a choice between a targeted, OFCC-partnered construction plan and a more costly district-only renovation. If voters approve the bond, the district expects to leverage state construction funds; if not, district officials said the local-only renovation option would be substantially more expensive.

What’s next: District staff said documentation has been filed to place the question on the May 5 ballot. No board vote on placing the question was recorded during this portion of the meeting.