Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Budget topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Mesquite council sets proposed tax rate at 0.73¢ and orders special election

Mesquite City Council · August 18, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Council approved placing a proposed 0.73¢ per $100 tax rate on the Nov. 4 special election ballot to fund a 5% merit increase and add first-responders; if voters reject it the adopted fallback will be the voter‑approved rate (70.46¢).

The Mesquite City Council voted on Aug. 18 to set a proposed ad-valorem tax rate of 0.73¢ per $100 of assessed valuation and to call a special election on Nov. 4 to let voters decide. City staff said the 0.73¢ rate would fund a 5% merit increase for employees and add three police officers and two firefighters; the voter-approved fallback rate would still fund a 3% merit increase and maintain baseline services.

Finance staff explained the mechanics and legal requirements for setting a rate above the no-new-revenue threshold, and noted that changes to the budget motions were prepared to match the 0.73¢ proposal. The city’s finance director and city manager reviewed a multi‑fund budget that also includes a $1 increase to the drainage utility and a 7% utility fund increase tied to North Texas Municipal Water District costs.

Council members debated tradeoffs and outreach. Several members said the $5-per-month equivalent to the average household was a modest ask to preserve services, address inflationary pressures and keep staffing competitive; others urged clearer public communication to avoid the perception of a tax increase. The council approved the ordinance levying the tax 6–1 and passed the related resolution ordering the special election unanimously.

Key numbers and outcomes: staff estimated the proposed rate would raise taxes on a $100,000 home by about $39.61; the voter‑approved rate was identified as 70.46¢ and the difference to the proposed 0.73¢ was presented as roughly $5 per month for an average homeowner. Council and staff emphasized the deadlines for election timelines and a planned public-education campaign beginning after Labor Day.

Next steps: staff will implement an outreach plan (mailers, town halls, media) and finalize ballot language and motions needed for the election schedule.