Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Telecom Tower topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Mesquite council denies conditional‑use permit for 125‑foot cell tower near residences
Summary
After extensive resident opposition and a 3–3 tie at Planning & Zoning, the City Council denied a conditional‑use permit for a 125‑foot monopole at 1028 S. Beltline. Staff said the proposal failed the city's separation standard (375 ft); the nearest occupied structure is about 111–112 ft away.
The Mesquite City Council voted on Sept. 15 to deny a conditional‑use permit (CUP) for a proposed 125‑foot monopole telecommunications tower at 1028 South Beltline Road.
Adam Bailey, director of planning and development services, told council that the site — on Anchor Baptist Church property — met maximum height and screening criteria but failed the ordinance’s required separation between towers and residences. Bailey noted the required separation from residential structures is three times the proposed height (375 feet) and that the nearest occupied structure is approximately 111–112 feet from the proposed tower center.
The application drew more than 45 online comments and five written notifications from property owners inside the statutory boundary; that level of opposition requires a super‑majority council vote for approval. The Planning & Zoning Commission voted 3–3 on the CUP, which under ordinance is deemed a denial. The applicant asked the council to postpone and provide time to prepare photo simulations and a redesign; council members pressed staff and the applicant on alternative sites and whether adjacent commercial or institutional sites had been considered.
An elder from a nearby congregation said the house within the proposed radius is occupied and serves Sharing Life housing programs for a family. A resident and a retired physician raised health concerns during public comment; the city attorney and staff explained that federal agencies (the FCC) regulate radio‑frequency emissions and that zoning decisions cannot be based on RF health claims.
Councilmembers emphasized separation and neighborhood character. Councilman Green moved to deny the application; the motion carried 6–1. Bailey said the applicant may revise the design and resubmit through the Planning & Zoning process.
Next steps: staff will record the council decision in the written record; the applicant may choose to redesign and reapply.
