Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Alcohol Licensing topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council denies Regent Street Mini Mart class B liquor application after neighborhood concerns
Summary
The Common Council voted to deny the Regent Street Mini Mart's request for a class B license permitting indoor/outdoor on‑premise consumption, citing neighborhood concerns about increased hard‑liquor availability and the density of licensed establishments near campus; two alder votes opposed the denial and several called for improved neighborhood engagement.
The Madison Common Council voted on Oct. 8 to deny Legistar 84,234, the Regent Street Mini Mart application to convert or expand its existing class A off‑premise license into a class B permit allowing on‑premise consumption (including outdoor seating) and wider alcohol sales. The denial was recorded on the grounds articulated at the Alcohol License Review Committee (ALRC) and reiterated in council discussion: concerns from neighbors about the proximity to campus and the potential public‑health and public‑safety impacts of permitting hard‑liquor sales at that convenience‑store location.
Owner Minu Kaushal said she had asked the council to refer the application back to the ALRC because she missed an ALRC meeting and wished to have legal counsel present: "I just want the opportunity for my legal counsel to present my case at the ALRC next meeting," she said. Alders and staff pressed for clarity about whether the application sought beer-and‑wine only or a full spirits allowance; City staff confirmed the applicant currently holds a class A license limited to beer, wine and cider for carryout and had applied for a class B that would allow on‑premise sales and, if full spirits were approved, the ability to sell hard liquor for carryout.
Alder Evers and others explained the neighborhood's longstanding objection to hard‑liquor sales at that location, citing the site's proximity to the UW campus and previously expressed neighborhood preferences and conditions from prior ALRC deliberations. Attorney staff explained that municipal code allows denial where the governing body finds an application contrary to public health, safety or welfare, and that ALRC had recommended denial based on the totality of circumstances, including density and changes to the application after prior neighborhood discussions.
After debate, the council moved to deny the application. The clerk recorded two alder 'no' votes (Alder Weheili and Alder Govindarajan); the motion otherwise carried and the license request was denied. The existing class A license for off‑premise sales (beer, wine, cider) remains in force regardless of the class B denial.
What happens next: Staff and several alder members urged the applicant to reengage with the Vilas Neighborhood Association and the district alder and return with a proposal that has neighborhood support or narrower conditions (for example, beer/wine only or clarified outdoor‑seating plans).
