Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Health Benefits topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Benefits vendor warns Van Buren County that hospital network disputes can increase employee costs
Summary
At a Van Buren County Quorum Court meeting, the county's benefits vendor told officials that a local hospital'insurer dispute could raise out-of-pocket costs for employees and outlined how reinsurance, reserves and telemedicine can limit county exposure.
A representative of the county's benefits vendor told the Van Buren County Quorum Court that recent negotiations between local hospitals and insurers can leave hospitals temporarily out of network and increase costs for employees who continue to use those facilities. The presentation, given during a public benefits Q&A with court members and department heads, focused on how the county's self-funded plan manages large claims and where employees can find lower-cost care.
The vendor representative described a recent case involving a Baptist hospital that sought higher prices while reducing PPO discounts, saying, “They were going to get double paid,” and that hospitals sometimes go out of network until it "hurts them enough that they sign to get back in network." The vendor said that when a hospital and carrier deadlock, the hospital may withhold cooperation until financial pressure forces a new contract.
Why it matters: Van Buren County operates a self-funded plan in which the county retains risk for claims up to set levels. The vendor told the court the county's plan includes specific stop-loss reinsurance (set for this group at $60,000 per member) and aggregate reinsurance to protect the fund from single catastrophic claims or an unusually costly year.
The vendor walked the court through how members are notified of network changes and how continuation-of-care and predetermination processes work. "An insurance company has to know what procedure is happening," the presenter said, explaining that providers and insurers use CPT codes for accurate pricing and that members should ask doctors for codes to obtain cost estimates. Emma Smiley, the county assessor, reported that some employees who tried to use a clinic option described in plan materials had difficulty getting promised services.
On cost-control tools, the vendor emphasized telemedicine and pharmacy management. The presenter recommended Teladoc for non-emergency care, calling it "a whole lot cheaper than an ER visit" and noting it is available 24/7. The vendor also said the county had realized pharmacy savings ("between $40,000 and $50,000" before rebates) through the implemented pharmacy program and that, unlike fully insured plans, those rebates and some savings remain with the county under self-funding.
Court members asked how monthly prefunding, reserves and state-required corridors work; the vendor explained the state requires a 25% reserve cushion and described monthly overdraft protections and prefunding that can be repaid by future claims deposits. The vendor said plan underwriting uses a three-year claims history to set expected claims baselines and cautioned that one year of data is informative but multi-year trends are more reliable.
The presentation concluded with the vendor offering individual follow-up and contact information for employees who continue to experience access or billing problems. "If they need to call me after hours, they can do that too," the presenter said. The court thanked the benefits team and moved to the next agenda item.
Ending: The court did not take formal action on benefits after the presentation; attendees were asked to escalate individual problems to the vendor or the county benefits team for direct assistance.
