Committee adopts amendment to shift contractor‑bond calls to Transportation Commission; SB 2049 advances
Loading...
Summary
An amendment to SB 2049 replaces Attorney General review with a Transportation Commission vote before ODOT calls a contractor’s bond, adding an oversight layer; the amendment passed and the committee advanced the bill 10–1 after debate over neutrality and process.
Vice Chair Fricks offered an amendment to Senate Bill 2049 that removes references to the Attorney General and substitutes the Transportation Commission (also referred to in discussion as the Highway Commission) as the body that must approve calling a contractor's bond.
Fricks said the amendment raises the decision from an ODOT staff determination to a Transportation Commission vote and explained the rationale as adding "some other eyes on this" for what he described as a high‑bar decision. "So, with the amendment... it would just raise it to the transportation commission making that decision," Fricks said, and argued that the commission already votes on awarding projects and change orders.
Senators questioned whether shifting review to the commission improves neutrality compared with the Attorney General and whether singling out ODOT is appropriate; Fricks said other agencies typically involve OMES and that ODOT is an exception. Senator Stewart argued the change may not prevent litigation because bond calls frequently lead to lawsuits, while Fricks and others said the extra layer protects staff and increases oversight.
The amendment was adopted by voice vote and later the committee voted to advance SB 2049 as amended with a roll call of 10 ayes and 1 nay.
The bill will proceed as amended to the next stage.