Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Zoning And Water topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Resident asks to build new home on barn parcel; town says water hookup is the primary constraint, item tabled until March
Summary
A Trenton resident asked whether they could build a new house on a parcel occupied by a barn; planning staff said the lot is legally grandfathered but water hookup timing and impact fees are the main hurdles. The board agreed to table action until March while members track state zoning changes and water availability.
A resident told the Trenton Planning and Zoning body that they want to demolish an old barn and build a new home on that parcel while keeping their current house as a rental or for family use. The comment came during public comment at the meeting.
The request focused on whether the parcel is legally buildable after prior splits and whether water service and other approvals would allow a second residence on the property. The resident said they “need some space, and I wanna either add or build on to my house.”
Planning staff and committee members said the two parcels appear to be legal, nonconforming lots and can remain separate if not combined, which would preserve the grandfathered status. The chair explained the practical constraint is water: “It’s a waiting list and they just go down,” and staff repeatedly said no occupancy certificates will be issued until a dwelling is “completely done and connected.”
Committee members walked the resident through the typical approvals: a zoning application with signoffs from health and fire, county engineer review, and confirmation that taxes are current. Staff said a zoning clearance typically allows six months for required work. On water fees, the resident summarized local estimates in the meeting, telling members the impact fee was “around 9,000 to 10,000” and installation roughly “3,000 to 4,000,” an estimate the resident said would put total hookup costs in the low‑to‑mid five figures.
The board emphasized rules that limit moving or sharing an existing meter: if the resident tears down the current house and rebuilds, water can be moved, but maintaining two separate residences on one meter is not allowed. Planning staff reiterated the sequence: get on the water waiting list (staff directed the resident to contact county water staff by email or phone), complete the zoning application, and secure the required signoffs before building permits will be issued.
Members noted pending state legislative discussions about easing acreage requirements for small, higher‑density housing, but said any local change would depend on state action and subsequent local code updates. The committee chose to table formal action on the resident’s specific permit request until March to allow time for the water issue and any legislative developments to be clarified.
What happens next: staff told the resident how to get on the water list and recommended following up with county staff; the planning group will monitor water availability and relevant state bills and revisit the application at the March meeting.
