Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Legal Enforcement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Sedona council unanimously approves binding waiver enforcement after closed-door session
Summary
After a closed executive session to discuss 34 notices of claims related to several parcels, the Sedona City Council returned to open session and unanimously approved Resolution 2026-01, a binding waiver enforcement for the properties listed on the agenda.
The Sedona City Council unanimously approved Resolution 2026‑01, a binding waiver enforcement measure for a list of properties identified on the meeting agenda, following a closed‑door executive session to obtain legal advice and consider pending claims.
The council went into executive session to consult with the city attorney under cited Arizona statutes and to consider the city’s position on 34 notices of claims tied to multiple parcels. The chair announced the session would address specific property matters, naming several entities and assessor parcel numbers (APNs) discussed as part of that review.
During roll call the clerk read the attendance, calling Mayor Ploog; Vice Mayor Fultz; Councilor Dunne; Councilor Furman; Councilor Hosseini; Councilor Kinsella; and Councilor Pfaff. The chair stated the council had a quorum before moving forward.
A motion and second were made to enter executive session for legal consultation. The council voted in favor and the chair stated, "We are unanimous," before closing the public portion to begin the executive session. After the executive session concluded, the chair announced the meeting was back in open session and sought any motions arising from the closed discussion.
A council member moved to approve "Resolution 2026‑01 — binding waiver enforcement for the listed properties as listed on the agenda." The motion was seconded and the council again voted in the affirmative. The chair noted the vote was unanimous.
No further details about the content of the executive session or specific terms of enforcement for each parcel were stated on the public record at the meeting. The council adjourned and the chair said the body would reconvene at 4:30 p.m.
The public record for this meeting shows the council used executive‑session authority to confer with legal counsel about pending or contemplated litigation and then approved a resolution making a binding enforcement decision on properties the agenda had identified.
