Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Technology topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
County committee debates iPad-to-laptop transition and contract oversight for Simple Communications
Summary
Committee members discussed replacing outdated iPads, budgeting for a transition to laptops for some board members, and asked Simple Communications to provide monthly reports; members noted the county obtained eight new iPads via rewards and that the Simple contract charges roughly $100 per workstation per month.
Get email alerts on the Technology topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee members debated a planned multi-year refresh of board technology after reviewing an email in the meeting packet about iPads. One member said the county secured eight new iPads using credit-card rewards but emphasized the priority is replacing devices that no longer receive security updates. "We have 8 brand new iPads right now in Matt's office... He was able to buy, like, 8 new iPads," one committee member said.
Members discussed whether to provide updated iPads or full laptops to some board members and proposed budgeting for a phased rollout — for example, replacing up to six workstations in a year and reassessing as members opt in. A committee member said offering options and budgeting the transition would avoid sudden large costs.
The committee also raised contract-oversight concerns about Simple Communications (the county's vendor). Several members said Simple should provide monthly reports — financial statements and workflow summaries — and that the committee would press for those reports during a scheduled meeting with Simple. "We do deserve on this committee to have some oversight over the contract," one member said.
Members discussed the vendor's typical charge of about $100 per workstation per month for county workstations and noted that replacement costs are factored into that monthly fee; the exact refresh cycle was described as not specified. No formal action or budget vote was taken; members said they would discuss budgeting options and follow up with county finance and the vendor.
