Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Housing topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee backs Bill 6 to increase apartment density and standardize lot frontage; DPP supports 60-foot minimum frontage
Summary
The committee reported out Bill 6-20-26 (CD1), a DPP-recommended amendment to reduce minimum lot size to 5,000 sq ft, set a 60-ft minimum lot frontage, and raise residential FAR in tiers; DPP and the Planning Commission support the bill while small developers urged targeted exemptions and some advocates proposed even higher FAR in certain zones.
The committee considered Bill 6-20-26 (CD1), a DPP-recommended alternative to the council's earlier proposal, which would revise development standards in apartment and apartment mixed-use (AMX) districts. Key changes in the CD1 include a 5,000-square-foot minimum lot size for apartment/AMX districts, a standard 60-foot minimum lot dimension for street frontage, and increases in maximum residential floor-area-ratio (FAR) by district: 2.0 in A1/AMX1, 3.0 in A2/AMX2, and 4.0 in A3/AMX3. Commercial FAR allowances remain separate and are not part of the overall maximum FAR.
Wilford Motosue, a local small developer, testified he supports the bill but requested exemptions from the affordable-housing set-aside requirement for small projects (e.g., exemptions for projects under specified unit thresholds), arguing that mandatory set-asides could make small projects financially unviable. Jonathan Helton, a policy analyst at the Grassroot Institute, told the committee his organization supports the bill and recommended two amendments: raising FAR in A2 from 3 to 4, and reducing lot width requirements to 50 or 45 feet to enable more efficient infill. DPP staff said they do not support the narrow-lot recommendation, noting narrower frontages can hinder pedestrian-oriented frontage, street trees, bus stops and other infrastructure the department considers necessary to support the higher densities; DPP said the department supports the CD1 footprint including a 60-foot minimum frontage.
After discussion, the chair recommended and the committee reported Bill 6-20-26 (CD1) out for passage on third reading to the full council.
