Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Historic Preservation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Historic preservation commission urges oversight, raises ADA and workmanship concerns at SS Nenana restoration
Summary
Commissioners and the 'Friends of SS Nenana' urged professional historic‑preservation oversight after staff noted a water‑diverter created an 8‑inch step that limits access; commissioners discussed previous unnecessary structural work and proposed sending refined recommendations to mayors and the assembly.
Commissioners spent substantial time discussing preservation and accessibility work on the SS Nenana, a landmark sternwheeler for which recent restoration work has prompted concerns from the Friends of SS Nenana.
Staff relayed a public‑works statement that recent installation of a 'water diverter' has effectively created a step at the bow that prevents ADA‑compliant access. Several commissioners and preservation advocates questioned that assertion and described prior plans and surveys indicating a ramp solution could meet ADA criteria with a long ramp and proper landings. Commissioners also said earlier contractors had added 'shoring' and other interventions that may not have been necessary, and that large rewiring and panel placements in prior conversions had altered or obstructed original features (for example, an original two‑man hand fire pump was located in front of an electrical panel).
Several commissioners and the Friends requested that future work be supervised by professionals with historic‑preservation qualifications and that the commission or qualified professionals be involved in design review and long‑range maintenance planning. Commissioners discussed sending a revised paragraph in the commission’s draft mayoral letter specifically addressing the SS Nenana and asking for follow‑up meetings with mayoral staff and the assembly. Staff said they would nudge the borough mayor’s office and could send the existing letter and a revised paragraph to both the borough and city mayors.
Commissioners emphasized the difference between routine borough or parks maintenance and the special treatment required for historic structures, noting that some repairs and designs—while conservative—can introduce unnecessary interventions that harm historic fabric. The commission did not adopt a new binding policy at the meeting but voted earlier to send the broader letter to the City of Fairbanks mayor and agreed to work on SS Nenana wording and follow‑up communications.
Next steps: staff will follow up with mayoral offices and inform the commission if the mayor’s office wishes to meet; commissioners asked that language on required professional qualifications and Secretary of the Interior standards be emphasized in future communications.
