Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Duplexes topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Lake Wales debate over duplexes: council opts to monitor impacts rather than reinstate prior limits
Summary
Staff explained a January 2024 code change that permitted duplexes and other 'missing middle' housing across residential districts; commissioners weighed parking, property‑value and legal concerns and agreed to continue monitoring rather than reverse the rule immediately.
Get email alerts on the Duplexes topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
City planning staff reviewed changes adopted under Ordinance 2023‑38 that made duplexes, single‑family attached units and accessory dwelling units permitted by right in residential zoning districts, a step intended to encourage 'missing middle' housing and infill development.
Why it matters: Residents raised complaints about on‑street parking and property values in neighborhoods that have recently seen a concentration of duplex construction. Commissioners considered three staff‑presented options: continue allowing duplexes by right, require a special‑exception (public‑notice) process in R‑1 districts, or remove duplexes as a permitted use in certain districts.
What was said: Planning staff described the code changes and standards that remain in place for duplexes — compliance with comprehensive plan density, dimensional standards (lot coverage, lot width, setbacks), and minimum parking (two spaces per unit). Staff reported 13 duplex permits since the ordinance was adopted and said they have been monitoring areas where duplexes have concentrated. A citizen complaint (Mr. Wilson) was cited as the instigator of the review.
Legal and policy considerations: One commissioner cautioned that imposing additional notice or permitting burdens could conflict with Senate Bill 180 and expose the city to legal challenges for adding restrictions to a newly recognized right. Several commissioners noted the code change was aligned with the Lake Wales Envision plan’s goals for infill and housing diversity.
Parking and design discussion: Commissioners debated mitigation strategies — encouraging rear parking and alley‑loaded designs where lot widths permit and promoting vertical townhouse designs that place parking out of public view — but staff said many older lots are narrow, and not all rear parking solutions are practical.
Outcome: After extended discussion, the commission expressed a preference to leave the permitted‑use change in place for now while proactively monitoring outcomes and pursuing design approaches to reduce potential negative impacts; no code change or vote was taken at the work session.
