Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Solid Waste Rates topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Consultants recommend 2026 increases and index change for solid-waste rates

College Station City Council · January 16, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

A Burns & McDonnell cost-of-service study recommended a FY2026 catch-up increase (roughly 10% for single-family, multifamily and roll-off) and switching annual indexing to the garbage-and-trash CPI; council directed staff to include changes in the upcoming fee resolution.

Consultants from Burns & McDonnell presented the citysolid-waste cost-of-service study during the June 12 workshop, recommending a multi-year approach to recover rising operational costs.

The firm said the industry-specific CPI for "garbage and trash" has risen faster than general CPI over the last several years and proposed that College Station switch its annual rate index from CPI-U to that sector index. For FY2026 the consultants recommended a one-time catch-up adjustment roughly equivalent to 5 percent plus the sector CPI (for a combined initial increase in the neighborhood of 10%) for single-family, multifamily and roll-off services; commercial front-load customers would see CPI-only adjustments in 2026 because the commercial class currently over-recovers its costs and subsidizes other services.

Consultants explained underlying drivers: labor, vehicle and disposal costs have increased materially and single-family bulky/brush pick-up and multifamily bulk handling are high-cost, peak-period services. The study proposed program options including contracted peak-period brush-and-bulky pickup for multifamily during move-in/out windows to relieve on-demand spikes. Burns & McDonnell also benchmarked College Station rates against other university communities and found the cityremains competitive despite under-recovery in some classes.

Councilmembers asked for implementation detail and expressed interest in revenue-neutral program design options (pay-as-you-throw tiers, go-back fees, frequency changes) to reduce burdens on lower-use customers. Staff said the recommended indexing and proposed FY2026 adjustments will be included in the draft fee resolution for council review during the budget process; no rate ordinance was adopted at the meeting.