District sets guardrails for generative AI use: students in grades 6–12 may access vetted tools, elementary focus on literacy

Wallingford-Swarthmore School District Policy Committee · March 4, 2026

Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts

Subscribe
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Staff presented revisions to the technology administrative regulation to clarify AI definitions, privacy ownership of student‑generated material and a companion set of implementation guidelines; recommended generative AI access limited to grades 6–12 with teacher oversight and parent resources provided.

District technology staff outlined March 3 changes to AR 4‑18 that add equity and accessibility language, privacy and security protections for generative AI tools, and user responsibilities for authorship and copyright.

Technology staff said district‑approved AI tools would be used within an enclosed environment so “we are not training the AI” on district content and that material generated by students in approved tools would be owned and managed by the district and/or the student creator. The administration proposed an age‑based approach: "only students in grades 6 through 12 should actually be using the generative AI tools," while elementary schools would focus on AI literacy and teacher professional development.

The AR also adds guidance that any AI tool adopted must go through the same vetting process as curricular materials, including independent evidence of effectiveness, safety and security. Staff said parent resources will be developed and that acceptable‑use and opt‑out procedures will remain part of the annual summer packet where families sign required forms.

Board members emphasized teacher training and clear implementation guidelines to ensure consistent elementary‑level literacy instruction and to avoid burdening librarians and classroom teachers. Members also asked for contract terms requiring vendor data‑deletion options and restrictions on third‑party reuse of sensitive student data; staff said they would pursue contractual protections where possible.

No formal vote was taken; the committee advanced the AR and companion guidelines for additional review and recommended staff return with clearer vendor‑vetting language and parent‑opt options prior to full board consideration.