Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Rezoning Fox Road topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Staff recommends denying planned‑commercial rezoning on Fox Road, citing neighborhood encroachment

Knox County Planning Commission · March 4, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Staff recommended denial of a rezoning request that would change a roughly 3.64‑acre Fox Road parcel from OB (office/medical) to PC (planned commercial), saying PC risks commercial encroachment into a residential area and does not align with the 2001 Fox Road corridor study.

Planning staff presented a rezoning request for about 3.64 acres on the west side of Fox Road (south of Kingston Pike) that would change the property from OB (office/medical) to PC (planned commercial). Staff recommended denial, saying the PC zone could allow uses incompatible with the adjoining low‑density neighborhoods despite the applicant’s proffered restrictive covenants limiting uses to things such as boat and farm‑equipment sales.

Staff noted historical context: the Fox Road corridor study was completed around 1999–2000 and adopted in 2001; subsequent development trends west of Kingston Pike favor small‑scale office and residential uses, while more intensive commercial development is concentrated along Kingston Pike. The 2024 comprehensive plan updated the area to a BP (Business Park) place type, which staff said is a closer fit than PC.

Commissioners asked whether watercraft sales would be allowed in OB (staff: no) and discussed the distance to the commercial corridor (roughly 0.61 miles) and nearby subdivisions under construction. Staff suggested conditions that could be added if the commission moved the request forward: recording restrictive covenants at the register of deeds and landscape buffering to shield neighboring residential areas.

No formal vote was recorded during the pre‑agenda presentation; staff left a denial recommendation for the commission to consider at the public hearing stage.