Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Hybrid Meetings topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission debates hybrid meeting options, legal limits on remote participation
Summary
Commissioners discussed legal constraints and logistical costs for hybrid or remote attendance, with general counsel warning about quorum, confidentiality for executive sessions, and staff outlining portable-technology options estimated between roughly $10,000 and $20,000.
The Commission on Ethics spent a sustained portion of its meeting discussing whether commissioners should be allowed to attend meetings remotely and what a hybrid meeting model would require.
General counsel explained two paths: in-person meetings (which require a physical quorum at the noticed location) and communications-media-technology (CMT) meetings where all members and parties participate remotely but public access points must be provided. He cautioned that fully remote executive sessions present confidentiality risks and that a member who attends a physical meeting remotely generally would not count toward the physical quorum. "If they are not in physical presence at the meeting, then they do not count towards the quorum," he said.
Staff described logistical options that could enable hybrid attendance in the court facility used for the meeting (Zoom plus a laptop/microphone), or use of Senate meeting rooms fitted with video boards; staff estimated a portable technology solution (Surface Hub + video board) might run around $20,000 while an iPad-plus-soundboard option could be less expensive. Commissioners raised fairness and optics concerns: one commissioner said it would look inequitable for commissioners to attend remotely when respondents are required to appear in person. A public commenter urged retaining in-person deliberations for better-quality interaction. The commission did not adopt a policy at the meeting and agreed to continue the conversation when a full commission is present.
