Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Appointments topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Minnesota MRPC regional meeting recommends Carl Samp as Brainerd-to-Elk River commissioner
Summary
The Brainerd-to-Elk River regional meeting of the Minnesota Mississippi River Parkway Commission recommended Carl Samp for the regional commissioner slot after a motion and no recorded opposition; the recommendation will go to the full MRPC for election at its next business meeting.
Get email alerts on the Appointments topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Minnesota Mississippi River Parkway Commission’s Brainerd‑to‑Elk River regional meeting on March 7 recommended Carl Samp for appointment as the region’s commissioner. The group heard Samp’s background and then moved, without additional nominations, to recommend him for election by the full commission.
The recommendation was introduced by Andrew George, research analyst with the Legislative Coordinating Commission, who explained the statutory appointment process and noted the panel had received five letters and emails in support of Samp. Johnny Empson, vice chair of the state commission, moved to recommend Samp; the motion was adopted with no recorded opposition and participants congratulated Samp on the recommendation.
Samp outlined his river‑focused career during his remarks, recounting work with the Initiative Foundation, seasonal roles with federal agencies and extensive involvement with national Mississippi River Parkway groups. He said he looks forward to another term to promote tourism, recreation and protection of the river’s intrinsic qualities.
The recommendation now proceeds to the Minnesota MRPC’s next full business meeting, where commissioners will vote to elect the regional commissioner. Andrew George said that election will take place at that meeting and that the appointment follows the commission process established under Minnesota statute (referenced in the meeting as Minnesota Statute 161.1419). The regional panel did not record a roll‑call vote in the meeting transcript; the group’s action was announced as prevailing and will be reflected in the full commission’s minutes.
No amendments to the recommendation were discussed during the meeting.

