Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Property Tax topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Council briefed on senior/disabled property tax exemption; staff recommends no change

Richardson City Council · February 16, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Finance staff told council the current $160,000 senior/disabled homestead exemption keeps the average exempt home's taxable value at roughly 30–33% of market value and recommended maintaining the exemption; staff estimated the current exemption saves an average senior about $867 on the city tax bill.

Todd Gastroff, director of finance, presented the annual review of Richardson's 65-and-disabled property tax exemption and recommended the council maintain the current $160,000 exempt value for the coming year.

Gastroff described how market value and taxable value differ and said, based on certified values, the average senior home market value is about $485,000. At the current exemption level, he said, the exempt value amounts to just under one-third of average market value and "saves seniors and disabled persons who receive the exemption $867 off of their City Richardson tax bill." He estimated the city-wide exempted value for the current year at about $7.4 million and projected that, with modest account growth, exemptions would total roughly $7.6 million next fiscal year.

Council members asked whether the one-third share of residential accounts receiving the exemption has been steady; Gastroff said recipients have increased roughly 1% per year over the past five years and confirmed the exemption applies only to a homestead occupied by the owner, not to additional investment properties.

Based on the presentation and the city's financial policy target (approximately 30% of market value), staff's recommendation was to maintain the current exemption level. Council did not adopt an ordinance or take a formal vote during this briefing; staff said no further action would be needed to maintain the exemption as it already exists.