Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Neighbors and board press safety, parking and scale concerns at Palo Alto ARB study session for 4103 Old Trace Road subdivision
Summary
At a March 5 Architectural Review Board study session, neighbors and board members raised traffic, emergency‑access and parking concerns about The Oaks, a proposed subdivision at 4103 Old Trace Road that would create 16 on‑site dwelling units under state density‑bonus and SB 330 rules; staff and the applicant said state law limits denial of certain waivers and cited a traffic study the developer commissioned; no action was taken.
The Palo Alto Architectural Review Board on March 5 held a study session on a proposed subdivision at 4103 Old Trace Road — branded by the developer as “The Oaks” — that would subdivide a 1.02‑acre vacant parcel into eight residential lots with eight single‑family homes and eight junior accessory dwelling units (16 on‑site units), including one deed‑restricted below‑market‑rate unit.
City project planner Nishitha Ghandicopa told the board the applicant submitted a compliant SB 330 filing in 2025 that froze development standards, and the project team is pursuing density‑bonus waivers and an AB 130 CEQA exemption. Ghandicopa said staff is evaluating AB 130 eligibility and conducting required tribal consultation, expected to be complete in April 2026; a vesting tentative map for the subdivision is tentatively scheduled to go to council in May.
Why it matters: neighbors said the site, which sits at the Erastradero Road and Old Trace Road intersection adjacent to Esther Clark Park, relies on a single ingress/egress and narrow local streets that already see high speeds and constrained sight lines. Residents and board members warned the added dwellings, deliveries and guest parking could impede emergency response and daily access for elderly neighbors.
Residents pressed safety and access concerns in a long public‑comment period. Shaillou Shmara, representing a group of neighbors, said the neighborhood’s single ingress and aging population made the proposal untenable: “We’re increasing the number of homes by 55%…it’s untenable in terms of…
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to keep reading
Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.
- Unlimited articles
- AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
- Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
- Follow topics and more locations
- 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat

