Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Labor and Public Employees Committee hears broad slate of worker-protection bills; survivors press limits on nondisclosure agreements

Labor and Public Employees Committee · March 3, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Labor and Public Employees Committee heard hours of testimony March 3 on bills covering NDAs, breastfeeding and menopause workplace protections, service‑worker retention, paycheck transparency, health‑care assault protections and teacher termination reform. Survivors and unions urged statutory changes; business and insurer witnesses warned of costs and implementation questions.

The Connecticut General Assembly’s Labor and Public Employees Committee held a public hearing March 3 on a wide package of worker‑protection bills, hearing federal‑compliance and workforce governance testimony from agency officials, survivors’ accounts and union pleas for stronger safeguards across health care, building services and schools.

Kelly Marie Velez Velaris, chief workforce officer and vice chair of the Governor’s Workforce Council, told the committee the state’s workforce board is currently out of compliance with federal WIOA requirements and said raised Bill 346 would add business members, include a vocational rehabilitation representative and cap membership at 61 to restore a business majority and allow Connecticut’s WIOA plan to proceed. “Without this approval, federal WIOA funds are at risk,” Velez Velaris said, citing annual WIOA funding of roughly $30–$34 million.

Survivors and advocates urged limits on nondisclosure agreements. Janelle Grant, who described herself as a survivor of workplace assault, testified — through counsel — in support of SB 355, which would void NDA provisions that bar employees from disclosing conduct they reasonably believe to be discrimination, harassment, retaliation or assault. Grant described being prevented from speaking about alleged misconduct and urged the committee to remove procedural barriers that require some claims to be exhausted at the Commission on Human Rights and Opportunities (CHRO) before court…

Already have an account? Log in

Subscribe to keep reading

Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.

  • Unlimited articles
  • AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
  • Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
  • Follow topics and more locations
  • 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
30-day money-back on paid plans