Residents say water-main break flooded basements; city cites statutory immunity and offers neighborhood meeting
Loading...
Summary
Multiple Grand Rapids residents described severe basement flooding after a June 13 water-main break, reporting thousands in damages and denied claims; Deputy City Attorney Straub cited governmental-immunity limits and suggested private counsel, while the city manager apologized and proposed a neighborhood meeting to explore assistance options outside formal claims.
Several Grand Rapids residents used the commission's public-comment period on Aug. 13 to describe extensive property damage from a June 13 city water-main break and to criticize the city's denial of their claims.
Jane Griffin, who said professional estimates of her household's damage exceed $25,000, said the city's August 23 denial letter stated the city had determined it was "entitled to statutory immunity." "This file is now closed," Griffin said she was told in the letter; she urged the commission to reconsider.
Other residents described similar losses, including mold, structural damage and repeated flooding in the same area over the past decade. Larry Gibbs estimated $70,000 to $80,000 would be needed to stabilize his home after sinkholes and ongoing water intrusion. "We got sinkholes outside of people's yards and just sitting there," Gibbs said, asking the commission to help.
Deputy City Attorney Straub acknowledged that government insurance and immunity issues make claims processes complex and time consuming, but warned the city attorney's office cannot provide private legal advice. "I would encourage you if you disagree or have questions about the denial letter, please feel free to seek your own legal private counsel to determine what your options might be related to that determination letter at this stage of the claims process," Straub said.
The city manager apologized to affected residents for the disruption and communication delays, and said staff are exploring options beyond the formal claims process. The manager proposed a neighborhood meeting to gather names of those impacted and to discuss potential ways the city and community partners could help while legal constraints are considered. "What I'd like to do is see if we can have a neighborhood meeting with those impacted residents," the city manager said, adding that staff and outside community partners have been asked to look for possible assistance.
Residents said they remain frustrated by the denial letters and the time it took to receive a response; they asked the commission to pursue remedies. The commission did not adopt a specific relief program at the Aug. 13 meeting, but staff committed to follow up with impacted neighbors and to explore possible options outside the claims process.
