Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Stays And Designation Timeline topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board reviews pending stays of demolition, 990 Arapahoe timeline and Fire Station 3 status
Summary
Staff told the Landmarks Board five applications remain pending, including four residential stays that lapse March 26 and an initiated designation for 990 Arapahoe; planning board concept review is set for April 7 and staff tentatively expects a May designation hearing window while noting capacity limits. Fire Station 3 (city‑owned) is eligible for designation but needs interdepartmental coordination.
At the March 4 meeting, city staff updated the Landmarks Board on five pending landmark alteration/demolition applications and related stays, including a set of four residential properties currently under stay until March 26 and one property (990 Arapahoe) for which the board previously voted to initiate the designation process.
"Those stays continue until March 26. If the board does not take action before that time, then the demolition applications will issue," Marcy told the board. Staff said the planning board will review the concept plan for 990 Arapahoe on April 7; if the application proceeds, the landmarks designation hearing would be scheduled within the standard 60–120 day window, making May or June likely hearing dates and creating a risk that subsequent city council review could be pushed into late summer because of council calendar breaks.
Chelsea Castellano asked whether the board could shift meeting dates or add a special meeting so a designation hearing could be held earlier and avoid delaying council review. Marcy replied that staff lacks capacity to add a special meeting between the planning board concept review and the time required for analysis and public noticing, but said tentatively that the May landmarks meeting could be used.
Staff also briefed the board on Fire Station 3 (1585 30th Street), a city‑owned building the staff considers eligible for landmark designation. Because the property is city‑owned, the review involves additional coordination across facilities, the city attorney’s office and the city manager’s office, and staff said it will likely take longer to resolve alternatives and potential stewardship options.
Board members noted religious‑holiday scheduling conflicts for early April and asked staff to monitor calendar constraints as hearings are scheduled. Marcy and Claire Brandt reminded members that, where applicable, the city has formal call‑up and appeal timelines tied to findings under Boulder Revised Code.
