Lifetime Citizen Portal Access — AI Briefings, Alerts & Unlimited Follows
Staff flag county‑line discrepancies with Forsyth; about 170 parcels could be affected
Loading...
Summary
County GIS staff showed mapping discrepancies between the county's boundary, Forsyth County's line, census boundaries and the state geodetic survey; staff said roughly 170 parcels may be affected and recommended asking the North Carolina Geodetic Survey to research and re‑establish the line, which would remove ambiguity over taxes, voting and school assignment for some residents.
Davidson County GIS staff told commissioners on March 5 that there are mapping differences along the northern boundary with Forsyth County and that those discrepancies could affect about 170 parcels and roughly 25 school‑age children.
GIS staff showed a series of maps comparing the county’s internally recorded line, Forsyth County’s mapping, the census boundary and the state geodetic survey representation; in places the differences were described as several hundred feet. Staff said some parcels are taxed by Davidson County while certain official records or other map layers show them in Forsyth County, creating confusion for taxation, elections and school assignments.
Jason Clafelter, who led the presentation, said the county can continue to resolve disputes on a case‑by‑case basis or request that the North Carolina Geodetic Survey conduct formal research and resurvey the boundary. He said the state survey would record monuments, provide preliminary and final plats, and file documents with the Secretary of State; the survey is initiated by written request from both counties and carries no direct state fee but requires staff assistance and could lead to valuation and tax changes for affected parcels.
Staff identified an initial count of about 170 parcels that could change jurisdiction if a resurvey is adopted and reported that school officials had identified 25 students at addresses that could be affected. Commissioners asked staff to pursue contact with state surveyors and to consult with the Board of Elections and the school system about possible transitions and phased approaches for students.
No formal action was taken; staff recommended moving to the next step of contacting the state geodetic survey if the board agrees.

