Law Committee advances resolution limiting county cooperation with certain ICE and Border Patrol operations
Loading...
Summary
After extended debate and redline edits, the Albany County Law Committee voted to forward a resolution that limits county cooperation with certain ICE and Border Patrol operations — including prohibiting 287(g) agreements and use of county property for federal staging or detention — as a favorable recommendation to the full legislature.
The sponsor introduced Resolution 55, describing proposed limits on local cooperation with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and U.S. Border Patrol operations. In opening remarks the sponsor said, "The Trump administration has mandated that ICE and border patrol arrest at least 3,000 immigrants a day," and described training and budgetary changes the sponsor characterized as evidence the agencies are "poorly trained, abysmally led," and engaged in misconduct. The sponsor said the resolution would prevent the sheriff's office from entering into agreements under section 287(g) of the INA that require local deputies to act as federal immigration enforcers and would bar county property from serving as staging areas or detention sites.
Committee members challenged the sponsor's characterization. Burgdorf said the measure represented "political resistance" and disputed some of the sponsor's claims about training and enforcement, noting past deportation figures under earlier administrations. Others raised operational questions about whether the resolution could inadvertently push ICE enforcement actions into neighborhoods rather than jails. Members worked through redline edits to remove conditional language tied to events outside Albany County and to clarify that the resolution would remain in effect until specifically withdrawn or sunsetted.
Nut graf: The committee voted to forward the resolution with the sponsor's proposed edits. The resolution, as amended, would prohibit county participation in certain agreements and the use of county property for deportation‑focused operations while expressly stating the county will continue to comply with federal immigration law to the extent required by statute.
The committee did not adopt all suggested edits from every member; debate focused on the scope of local authority, constitutional implications, and unintended operational consequences. The item will go to the full county legislature with a favorable recommendation for consideration and possible adoption.
Ending: The resolution will be considered by the full Albany County Legislature; staff and counsel may further refine the text prior to that vote.
