Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Brownfield Seeds Of Promise topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
City Commission hears Seeds of Promise Brownfield amendment, refers 14-home infill project to committee
Summary
City staff and project proponents presented a Brownfield plan amendment for the Seeds of Promise redevelopment — 14 for-sale infill homes on 13 parcels with development costs of about $3.8 million and roughly $1.2 million in Brownfield-eligible activities; the commission referred the plan to the Committee of the Whole for further review.
City commissioners on Nov. 5 heard a public hearing and presentation on a Brownfield plan amendment for the Seeds of Promise redevelopment, a proposal to build 14 for-sale infill homes across 13 parcels in Grand Rapids.
City staff introduced the item and said the plan covers 14 houses (one parcel to be split), ranging from one- to three-bedroom units targeted to a mix of incomes roughly between 80% and 120% of area median income over a 25-year Brownfield plan. City staff cited total development costs of about $3,800,000 and said approximately $1,200,000 of that is Brownfield-eligible housing activity. The Brownfield Redevelopment Authority recommended a $200,000 Brownfield redevelopment revolving fund loan intended to reduce mortgage burdens on seven homes targeted at 80% AMI.
Reginald Thomas, introduced by staff as a project representative, described the project’s mix of home sizes and income tiers and said the plan is intended to facilitate lot splits and homeownership on several currently vacant parcels. He said the team is seeking tools to make the homes financeable and affordable over time.
Todd Vaneken of InovaLab Development Group, who identified himself as the builder, described the houses as factory-built units (MH Advantage/modular style) rather than older mobile homes. Vaneken said glued drywall, upgraded roof lines and higher energy-performance standards make these units more comparable to site-built homes and that the MH Advantage product enables 30-year mortgage financing through Fannie Mae. He said the developer’s delivery model can shorten on-site installation timelines; he cited a completed seven-house neighborhood that took roughly 45 days to install.
Project representatives also described an inclusion plan that reserves roughly 17% (about $286,000) of certain contract dollars for local women- and minority-owned subcontractors and said professional services will be fully sourced locally where possible. The project team said financing partners and sources include InovaLab, Champion (manufacturer), IFF and MSHDA.
Several members of the public voiced support. Aidan Wysocki, who said he lives near Alexander Street, called the plan a “great use of the Brownfield plan,” noting renderings he’d seen and saying the homes appeared likely to sell for under $250,000. Dee Jones offered brief praise for the project. One resident asked whether the homes would be all-electric or mixed fuel; presenters did not commit to a final energy system in the hearing but emphasized improved energy performance compared with older manufactured housing.
Commissioners asked clarifying questions about the “smart homes” label, construction differences versus older manufactured units, financing comparables and realistic timelines for occupancy. Commissioner Boettcher asked why the units were called “smart homes”; Vaneken said the term reflected manufacturing, consistent quality, energy performance and quicker installation rather than in-home automation.
After the presentation and public comment, Mayor LeGrand referred the Brownfield plan amendment to the Committee of the Whole for additional review and next steps.
The hearing is now scheduled for committee review; no action on the Brownfield plan amendment was taken at the Nov. 5 meeting.
