Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Policy topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board briefed on draft alcohol policy to allow limited concessions sales; vendor assumed liability

Public Universities Board of Trustees Meeting · June 27, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

General counsel presented a draft policy to allow alcohol sales at some sporting-event concessions, noting the vendor would handle licensing and insurance; athletics and counsel said a telephone board poll could be used for approval.

Kelly Douglas, the university’s general counsel, briefed the board on a draft revision to the campus alcohol policy that would permit alcohol at certain concessions during sporting events and delete earlier language about who would supply alcohol in stadium suites.

Douglas said the draft in the board book reflects those adjustments and that athletic and food-and-beverage staff are interested in moving the policy forward. She told governors the university would rely on contracted vendors to obtain permits, licensing and additional insurance and to carry primary liability; the vendor would name the university as an additional insured and staff would provide oversight. Dean Carter (athletics) noted the campus is switching concessions to Aramark, which would simplify implementation because Aramark already manages event service and compliance.

Douglas suggested the board could use a telephone board poll roughly 30 days after the meeting to consider approval rather than convening a special meeting. Board members asked about revenue projections, liability and whether best practices at peer institutions were being followed; Douglas and athletics staff said projections were not yet available and that procedures would follow standard industry practices and vendor protocols.

Next steps: board members were asked to review the draft policy in the board book and the administration proposed a board poll in roughly 30 days to consider approval if no substantial changes are requested.