Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the School Safety topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Sayreville board rejects policy to ban open-flame candles after safety vs. tradition debate
Summary
The Sayreville Board of Education voted 4–5 on March 3 to reject a proposal to ban open-flame candles at district events and ceremonies, after members traded safety concerns about student risk with arguments defending long-standing National Honor Society traditions and the fire department’s permitting process.
The Sayreville Board of Education on March 3 declined to adopt a policy that would ban open-flame candles at district events and ceremonies, rejecting the motion 4–5 after nearly an hour of discussion that focused on student safety and school traditions.
Board member Lucy Bloom introduced the motion, urging a ban because some ceremonies — notably National Honor Society inductions — require a fire-inspection permit and a fire official on site. "The fire chief has to be present with a fire extinguisher and a fire blanket," Bloom said, describing students marching with lit candles and the risk of a stumble near curtains or on risers.
Supporters of a ban said modern LED candles can preserve ceremony appearance while reducing risk. Board member Jeff (last name not specified in the transcript) argued that technology has advanced and that artificial candles have been used successfully in professional productions. "If we can possibly prevent something from happening in the future, I don't see how we could not vote for it," he said.
Opponents said the district follows fire-department protocols and that removing open flames would strip a meaningful tradition from students. Superintendent Dr. Labbe and other board members noted that permits and on-site inspection are issued by fire authorities. "They basically have told us that the ceremony that we are doing is safe. Otherwise, they wouldn't issue the permit to us," Dr. Labbe said, arguing the probability of an incident is minimal when inspectors supervise the events.
Board president (name not specified in the transcript) framed the policy question as one of weighing small probabilities against ceremony benefits: "I'm not going to supersede his determination on it," the president said, referencing the fire marshal's expertise.
The motion, made by Bloom and seconded by Board member Smith, failed on a roll call vote: Bloom, Callahan, Kaski and Smith voted yes; Hernandez, Napolitano, Plabone, Maldonado and Fernandez voted no (4 yes, 5 no). The board did not adopt a districtwide ban; members discussed alternatives such as spacing students further, staging adjustments, or switching to artificial candles in some ceremonies.
The board chair then moved on to other business, and the meeting continued with previously scheduled agenda items.
Why it matters: The vote highlights a recurring tension for school districts between minimizing low-probability safety risks and preserving student traditions. The board’s discussion shows openness to compromise (spacing, staging, artificial candelabra options) but stopped short of a blanket prohibition.
