Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Zoning Ordinance Parking topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning board recommends parking ordinance changes to Town Council, flags major drafting issues
Summary
The board recommended the proposed parking and vehicle-storage ordinance amendments are consistent with the comprehensive plan but said the draft is "deeply flawed," citing ambiguity on trailers, unregistered vehicles, municipal land exceptions and enforcement timelines; the board suggested moving language and shortening compliance windows.
The Lincoln Planning Board voted to recommend that the proposed zoning ordinance amendments addressing parking and storage of vehicles be forwarded to the Town Council as consistent with the comprehensive plan, while urging substantial revisions to clarify scope and enforcement.
Staff presented proposed additions (sections c and d) to the town code intended to restrict parking or storage of commercial vehicles, trailers and unregistered vehicles in residential districts and on certain public or non-privately owned land. The solicitor's office suggested adding the sections to clarify that parking on town property and town easements should be restricted where appropriate (Town Planner Stephanie).
Why it matters: Board members flagged drafting errors and ambiguous cross-references that could create enforcement gaps or unintended exceptions. They recommended reintroducing explicit trailer language, clarifying whether 'non-privately owned land' should read 'municipal land' or be broadened to other public entities, and shortening the current 90-day compliance window for unregistered or junked vehicles.
Key points discussed included:
- Text clarity and section numbering: Members pointed out the agenda referenced a different section number than the draft and requested changes be shown in red to make revisions easy to review.
- Trailers and nonconforming uses: The draft removed references to 'commercial trailers' and changed 'legal' to 'nonconforming' in some places; the board agreed to revert to original 'a' language so trailers would clearly be prohibited where intended and cross-references to section 260-31 would be explicit.
- Enforcement timeline: Several members questioned why the existing allowance for removal of unregistered or junked vehicles was 90 days; some favored a 30-day compliance period and suggested moving the timeline clause earlier in the sentence for clarity.
- Municipal and public land exceptions: Members debated whether section c's wording 'non-privately owned land' should specify 'municipal land' or explicitly include other public entities (schools, CCRI), and discussed time-limit exceptions for accessing public services versus long-term storage on town property.
The board moved to recommend the ordinance to the Town Council as consistent with the comprehensive plan but recorded that the draft is "deeply flawed" and needs substantive fixes. The motion carried by voice vote.
Next steps: The board asked staff to coordinate with the solicitor and the ordinance sponsor to produce a clearer draft (showing edits in red), shorten compliance timelines where appropriate, clarify trailer and trailer-trailer language and explicitly define municipal/public land exceptions before the Town Council considers the amendments.
