Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Boundary Change topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board denies petition to attach single property to Elmbrook; trustees cite island and cost concerns
Summary
A petition to detach one property from the Waukesha district and attach it to Elmbrook was denied in a 7‑yes roll‑call vote after trustees raised concerns about creating an island, bus costs and precedent; petitioners were told they may pursue broader territory or appeal to DPI.
The Elmbrook School District board voted Feb. 24 to deny a petition requesting detachment of a single home at 550 West Ravenswood Hills Circle from the Waukesha County School District and attachment to Elmbrook.
Petitioners Jordan and Chelsea presented maps and said the move would shorten commutes and allow their children to attend school with local friends. Jordan said the family had explored open enrollment but that option was not available for the 2026–27 school year and asked the board to accept their petition.
Board members discussed statutory procedures, prior detachment precedent and practical impacts. Trustees and administration warned that approving a lone property would create an island, could increase transportation costs and set a precedent that might encourage repeat petitions. The board noted successful past requests had generally involved contiguous groups of homes rather than single lots.
Mary Wacker moved to deny the petition; Jean Lambert seconded. On roll call the motion to deny carried 7–0 (yes votes recorded from the full board present), and the petition was denied. Board members advised the petitioners that gathering broader neighborhood support or pursuing a larger contiguous territory would make a stronger case in future proceedings and that appeals could be taken to the state Department of Public Instruction if needed.
The board also discussed a procedural detail noted in DPI guidance: if substantially the same territory is petitioned in back‑to‑back years, boards may need to consider waiving timelines; members recommended petitioners consult with district administration and DPI staff about strategy.
The board’s action was limited to the petition before it; no boundary changes were approved.
