Planning board backs setback and MXD design changes, sends recommendations to council
Loading...
Summary
The Balcones Heights Planning & Zoning advisory board voted Feb. 17 to recommend amendments to multiple setback standards across residential, commercial and mixed‑use districts and to forward proposed MXD design/form standard changes to city council.
The Balcones Heights Planning & Zoning advisory board voted to recommend amendments to Chapter 153 of the city code that adjust front, side and rear setbacks across multiple zoning districts and to forward proposed design and form standards for the MXD (mixed‑use) district to city council.
In the meeting’s business session, staff presented proposed changes that would set front setbacks at 25 feet for R1–R4 residential districts and 5 feet for O1–M2 office, commercial and manufacturing zones, with side setbacks generally set at 5 feet and rear setbacks adjusted variably by district. For MXD properties staff described a different regime with a 20‑foot maximum front setback in some areas and a 5‑foot minimum in others.
The board discussed separate treatment for metal shipping containers and other cargo units, with several members saying such structures raise distinct fire‑safety and aesthetic issues. One member urged sending a letter to city council asking that the cargo/shipping‑container ordinance be opened so the council can consider container‑specific setbacks or screening requirements. Staff said container regulation likely sits with city council rather than with the zoning code alone.
A formal motion carried to recommend the presented setbacks to city council. The motion was made and seconded and the chair declared the ayes have it.
The board also considered Article 4 (design and form standards) as it applies to MXD districts. Staff reviewed the proposed scribe‑throughs and the new front/side/rear rules for mixed‑use property. After brief discussion, the board moved and approved a recommendation to city council to amend Article 4 as presented.
Both recommendations are referrals — the board directed staff to forward the drafted ordinance language and related materials to city council for formal action. The board did not adopt changes to the city code itself; instead it voted to send its recommendations to the council for consideration.
What’s next: staff said it will assemble the ordinance language and return it to the city council; the planning board will revisit any technical revisions or container‑specific amendments if council requests them or if the board is asked to draft follow‑up language.
