Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Zoning Variance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
TRC flags character, survey gaps in proposed two‑family at 12 Ton Lonsdale Avenue
Summary
The committee questioned a proposal to convert a single‑family home into a two‑family at 12 Ton Lonsdale Ave (lot 10,000 sq ft in RL9), citing missing/scheduled survey, potential setback conflicts and neighborhood character. The TRC suggested conditions (including enclosing the connector) and recommended the zoning board weigh comp‑plan consistency; the committee passed a recommendation reflecting these concerns.
A proposal to add a second residential unit at 12 Ton Lonsdale Avenue prompted lengthy discussion at the Technical Review Committee about lot area, neighborhood character and required documentation. The application, submitted on behalf of Jamil Khalil, would convert an existing single‑family dwelling into a two‑family by adding an attached roofed element; the lot is 10,000 square feet but RL9 requires 12,000 square feet for a two‑family.
Staff noted there is not yet a stamped survey; the applicant has scheduled a survey in the coming weeks but the TRC spoke about options for how to approve relative to that uncertainty (approve with survey condition, require the survey before zoning board action, or condition a later adjustment if measurements differ). Committee members raised concerns the proposed addition, as depicted, could be 'out of character' for the surrounding single‑family area and stressed that granting relief should not alter the general character of the neighborhood.
Several members suggested a design condition to make the connecting structure an enclosed mudroom (walls) rather than a minimal roofed connector, both to reduce the risk of dilapidation and to give the assembled structure a more cohesive appearance. Staff also reminded the applicant of wetlands/jurisdictional limits near the property and possible DEM involvement, as well as potential DOT work for curb/sidewalk changes.
The TRC ultimately voted to forward its concerns and a recommendation for the zoning board to weigh comp‑plan consistency; the motion passed by voice vote.
What was said: Chair (S1) emphasized the need for a survey and clear lot measurements before final approval. A committee member observed, "I don't think the use is consistent" with the surrounding area, reflecting the group’s caution about changing neighborhood character.
Next steps: The matter goes to the zoning board; staff said the board may approve with the condition that the survey matches the approved plans or require a subsequent dimensional variance if measurements differ.
