Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Annexation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Burlington council annexes four city‑owned parcels, including Valley Golf Course
Summary
The Burlington City Council approved four city‑initiated annexations of city‑owned parcels — Greeson Lane right of way, Guilford McIntosh Park & Marina, University Commons city lot and Valley Golf Course — after residents raised concerns about taxes, covenants and potential development. Staff said the annexations align jurisdictional boundaries and do not include water/sewer extensions or immediate development plans.
Get email alerts on the Annexation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
BURLINGTON — The Burlington City Council voted to annex four city‑owned parcels on Tuesday night, bringing the Greeson Lane right of way, Guilford McIntosh Park & Marina, the University Commons city lot and the Valley Golf Course formally into the city limits.
Jamie Lawson, director of planning and development services, told the council these properties are contiguous to existing city boundaries and are being annexed because the city already owns and maintains them. Lawson said the annexations are administrative and that maps established by licensed surveyor work (meets and bounds) would be sent to the Secretary of State as part of the normal process.
The actions drew public comment from nearby residents concerned about property lines, possible development and higher property taxes. "We are just opposing it," said Wanda Small, who identified herself as an adjoining property owner, citing worries that proposed road connections and traffic would cut through family farmland and affect elderly residents and children. Ron Walker, another resident with several properties inside the golf‑course loop, urged council members to respect existing covenants and said owners have an architectural review committee that would have a role if development were ever proposed. "This land is the city's own property, and I would say you could do about anything you want with the city's own property," Walker said, asking council to note the historical covenants in Indian Valley.
Council members and staff repeatedly said the annexations do not include any planned extension of city water or sewer services and that there are no immediate plans for development tied to the moves. A council member who spoke in favor of the package described the approvals as "clean[ing] that up" administratively and said bringing the parcels into the city limits better reflects the city's ongoing investments and maintenance of those sites.
Councilors approved each annexation by voice vote following brief discussion. The meeting record shows motions and seconding for each item and unanimous "Aye" responses to the roll calls; the transcript does not include a numerical roll‑call tally. After the votes, staff reiterated that the primary purpose of several purchases from Gibsonville was to protect the lake and surrounding natural areas from future development.
Residents were told that annexation changes jurisdictional responsibility — for example, Burlington police and fire would respond on city property — but does not itself alter property covenants recorded privately among homeowners. Council said any future changes to land uses would be subject to whatever covenants and regulatory review apply.
The council asked staff to continue the routine process of filing the annexation maps and to return with any additional materials or subsequent annexation petitions when they are ready. The meeting adjourned after brief announcements about community events and a commendation to city emergency services.
Next steps: filings with the Secretary of State and administrative updates to city records; no immediate utility extensions or development were announced.

